Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 853 SW2D 697 - Lawrence v. Kohl

Lawrence v. Kohl’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

29
cited by 29 later decisions
1
states following
May 2018
most recently cited

29 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently May 2018 · most notably Metzger v. Sebek (1994), In Re Bennett (1998)

29 state decisions

100199320002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 246th Judicial District Court)

Relationships

Relies on Downer v. Aquamarine Operators, Inc. · Eichelberger v. Eichelberger · Mercer v. Bludworth · Braden v. Downey · Okon v. Levy

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Inherent power to sanction exists to the extent necessary to deter, alleviate, and counteract bad faith abuse of the judicial process, such as any significant interference with the traditional core functions of Texas courts. Accordingly, for inherent power to apply, there must be some evidence and factual findings that the conduct complained of significantly interfered with the court’s legitimate exercise of one of these powers.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “an appellate court may reverse the trial court's ruling only if the trial court acted without reference to any guiding rules and principles, such that its ruling is arbitrary and unreasonable.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.