Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 853 SW2D 734 - Thomas v. State

Thomas v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
December 2000
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 184th Judicial District Court)

Relationships

Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Mahan & Rowsey, Inc. v. Oklahoma Natural Gas · Bourjaily v. United States · Pope v. Nebraska · Daniels v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[fjor the purposes of a limited Terry search by armed police officers, we hold that a suspicion that a pen or pencil is in a detainee’s pocket does not constitute a reasonable suspicion that a weapon is being concealed. Accordingly, we hold the removal of the object, which [the] Officer [ ] thought was a pen or pencil, from appellant’s pocket, constituted an illegal search without probable cause.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.