United States v. O'Malley’s Empirical Analysis
854 F.2d 1085 · 1988
Citation profile
27 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 36 later decisions — most recently November 2019 · most notably United States v. Rearden (2003), United States v. Knox (1994)
27 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2251 (Child Pornography Prevention Act of 1996) · 18 U.S.C. § 2252 · 18 U.S.C. § 2256
Relies on Roth v. United States · Hampton v. United States · National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. Federal Power Commission · United States v. Dion · United States v. Quinn
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“lascivious exhibition of the genitals or pubic area of any person.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage“While this determination could certainly have been resolved differently, it is not our function as a reviewing court to reverse based on a recognition of alternate possibilities.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Hill v. Norris
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.