Reid Susman v. R Schmid F G’s Empirical Analysis
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 50 later decisions — most recently April 2019 · most notably In Re: Bayshore Wire Products Corp (2000), 239 Ill. App. 3d 1034 - Sarno v. Thermen (1992)
3 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Alyeska Pipeline Service Company v. Wilderness Society · Christiansburg Garment Co. v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission · Budinich v. Becton Dickinson & Co. · Yermakov v. Fitzsimmons · Exchange National Bank v. Daniels
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 50 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(i) If the court dismisses a petition under this section other than on consent of all petitioners and the debtor, and if the debt- or does not waive the right to judgment under this subsection, the court may grant judgment— (1) against the petitioners and in favor of the debtor for— (A) costs; or (B) a reasonable attorney’s fee; or (2) against any petitioner that filed the petition in bad faith, for— (A) any damages proximately caused by such filing; or (B) punitive damages.”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“clearly contemplates that fees and costs will not be awarded in all cases.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“against any petitioner that filed the petition in bad faith.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. In Re Diloreto · Wesley Higgins Arlene Higgins Bert Vincent Leora Vincent, and Vortex Lures Lp Viking Lures Mfg Inc. Witchcraft Tape Products Inc. Mesch Clark & Rothschild, Pc Rodger Ford Amy Ford v. Vortex Fishing Systems, Inc., and Vortex Fishing Systems, Inc., Debtor. Wesley Higgins Arlene Higgins Bert Vincent Leora Vincent, and Vortex Lures Lp Viking Lures Mfg Inc. Witchcraft Tape Products Inc. Mesch Clark & Rothschild, Pc Rodger Ford Amy Ford v. Vortex Fishing Systems, Inc., and Vortex Fishing Systems, Inc., Debtor
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.