Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 854 F.2d 223 - Citizens Marine National Bank v. United States Department of Commerce, Economic Development Administration

Citizens Marine National Bank v. United States Department of Commerce, Economic Development Administration’s Empirical Analysis

854 F.2d 223 · 1988

Citation profile

25
cited by 25 later decisions
February 2010
most recently cited

16 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently February 2010 · most notably Goodhand v. United States (1994), First Tennessee Bank National Ass'n v. Barreto (2001)

16 federal appellate ·

1401988199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 19 U.S.C. § 2341 · 19 U.S.C. § 2342 · 19 U.S.C. § 2350

Relies on United Mine Workers of America v. Gibbs · Heckler v. Community Health Services of Crawford County, Inc. · Aldinger v. Howard · Zahn v. International Paper Co. · Weinberger v. Kendrick

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he best generalization about the current status and scope of pendent-party jurisdiction may be that no generalization is possible; the second best may be that, unsatisfactory as it is to have a sliding scale for jurisdiction, the existence of pendent-party jurisdiction depends upon the pros and cons of exercising such jurisdiction in particular circumstances.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “We begin by setting our stage: Where A [our Plaintiff] brings a federal suit, based on federal law, against B [Pellegrini and Johnson] and also has a claim under state law against C [the city, the county, Troyer, and DeMarco], we generally allow the district court to exercise jurisdiction over the state-law claim. This is “pendent party” jurisdiction____”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.