Kele v. Carlson’s Empirical Analysis
854 F.2d 338 · 1988
Citation profile
11
cited by 11 later decisions
January 1994
most recently cited
8 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Relies on Romano v. Luther · Kele v. United States Parole Commission
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“does not apply to persons who will be on parole or mandatory release supervision at the expiration of the five-year period.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“The United States Parole Commission shall set a release date, for an individual who will be in its jurisdiction a day before the expiration of five years after the effective date of this Act, that is within the range that applies to the prisoner under the applicable parole guideline. A release set pursuant to this paragraph shall be set early enough to permit consideration of an appeal of the release date, in accordance with Parole Commission procedures, before the expiration of five years following the effective date of this Act. (emphasis added).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.