In re Calmar, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
854 F.2d 461 · 1988
Citation profile
35 federal appellate · 6 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 175 later decisions — most recently June 2017 · most notably In re the Regents of the University of California (1996), In re Genentech, Inc. (2009)
35 federal appellate · 6 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1292 · 35 U.S.C. § 282
Relies on Gulfstream Aerospace Corp. v. Mayacamas Corp. · Coordinated Pretrial Proceedings in Petroleum Products Antitrust Litigation City of Long Beach v. Standard Oil Company of California · In re Innotron Diagnostics · McCullough v. Kammerer Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 175 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]here is no conflict between § 1292(c)(2) and Rule 62(a)’s grant of the discretion to stay or to proceed with the damages trial during the appeal. Indeed, in recognition of the district court’s discretion, this court has repeatedly denied, in unpublished opinions, motions to stay damages trials during appeals in patent cases.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“[T]he policy underlying Sec. 1292(c)(2) was to allow a district court to stay a damages trial pending appeal.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“the sanctioning of counsel stemmed from a controversy about the meaning of 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1292(c) and the timing of the damage portion of a patent trial. These issues are bound up with and controlled by the doctrinal responsibilities of this court.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.