Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 854 F.2d 981 - Hatch v. Lane

Hatch v. Lane’s Empirical Analysis

854 F.2d 981 · 1988

Citation profile

26
cited by 26 later decisions
September 2013
most recently cited

19 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently September 2013 · most notably Shapiro v. UJB Financial Corp. (1992), Otis v. City of Chicago (1994)

19 federal appellate ·

1701988199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 1915 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Coniston Corporation v. Village of Hoffman Estates · Ordower v. Feldman · Elfenbein v. Gulf & Western Industries, Inc. · Reytblatt v. Denton · Hickey v. Duffy

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[i]f a district court's dismissal leaves a plaintiff free to file an amended complaint, the dismissal is not considered a final appealable order.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[complaint] dismissed without prejudice to plaintiff's filing within 30 days an amended complaint limited to [a particular claim].”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.