United States v. Diaz’s Empirical Analysis
854 F.3d 197 · 2017
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 922 (Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act) · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics · Graham v. Connor · United States v. Robinson · Rawlings v. Kentucky
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“it is only when the legal question is unsettled that an officer’s erroneous assessment of the law can be objectively reasonable”). A panel of our court has similarly viewed Heien as laying down restrictive”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“reasonable suspicion can rest on a mistaken understanding of the scope of a legal prohibition.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“); United States v. Diaz, 122 F.Supp.3d 165 , 171 (S.D.N.Y. 2015) (”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.