Minto v. Sessions’s Empirical Analysis
854 F.3d 619 · 2017
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 48 U.S.C. § 1806 · 8 U.S.C. § 1101 (§ 101 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1182 (§ 212 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1225 (§ 235 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1229A (§ 240 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on De Martinez v. Ashcroft · Palmer v. Immigration & Naturalization Service · United States v. Leon Guerrero S · Ali v. Reno · Kumar v. Holder
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“no alien who is lawfully present in the Commonwealth pursuant to the immigration laws of the Commonwealth on the transition program effective date shall be removed from the United States on the grounds that such alien's presence in the Commonwealth is in violation of section 212(a)(6)(A) of the Immigration and Nationality Act,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Torres v. Barr“any immigrant at the time of application for admission ... who is not in possession of a ... valid entry document”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Torres v. Barr“at the time of application for admission”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Torres v. Barr
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.