Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 854 NE2D 7 - Payne v. State

Payne v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2006

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
3
states following
June 2015
most recently cited

22 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Chapman v. State of California · Arizona v. Fulminante · Missouri v. Seibert · Joyner v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the error is inconsistent with substantial justice”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “a substantial right of the party is affected.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “the defendant's own confession is probably the most probative and damaging evidence that can be admitted against him.... The admissions of a defendant come from the actor himself, the most knowledgeable and unimpeachable source of information about his past conduct. Certainly, confessions have profound impact on the jury, so much so that we may justifiably doubt its ability to put them out of mind even if told to do so.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.