State v. Singleton’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

4 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “Id. The facts within the affidavit in Singleton noted that defendant had a substantial history of drug violations at her residence, police officers witnessed a known drug trafficker at defendant's residence, and police officers observed drug sales activity at the residence within one month of obtaining the search warrant. See id. In contrast, Utah Deputies in this case noted that Utah Informant had purchased methamphetamine from Da-ble's residence”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 2003 UT App 389 - State v. Dable

2. “' "[where the affidavit properly recites facts indicating activity of a protracted and continuous nature, a course of conduct, the passage of time becomes less significant.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 2003 UT App 389 - State v. Dable

3. “facts indicating defendant was involved in continuous and ongoing criminal activity at defendant's residence.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 2003 UT App 389 - State v. Dable