State v. Nilson’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
October 2002
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Benton v. Maryland · Abney v. United States · Wade v. Hunter · United States v. Dinitz · Downum v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(c) The court finds and states for the record that the termination is necessary because: (i) It is physically impossible to proceed with the trial in conformity -with the law; or (ii) There is a legal defect in the proceeding not attributable to the state that would make any judgment entered upon a verdict reversible as a matter of law; or (in) Prejudicial conduct in or out of the courtroom not attributable to the state makes it impossible to proceed with the trial without injustice to the defendant or the state; or (iv) The jury is unable to agree upon a verdict; or (v) False statements of a juror on voir dire prevent a fair trial.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Castle
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.