Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 854 SO2D 1 - Barnes v. State

Barnes v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2003

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
May 2010
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · 461 So. 2d 686 - Jones v. State · 716 So. 2d 1083 - Gleeton v. State · 616 So. 2d 899 - Porter v. State · Griffin v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “When presented with facts from which the jury could infer the predicate state of mind of the defendant, it is permissible for the jury to use such inferences to find the defendant guilty of manslaughter rather than murder.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “When there is a jury issue on the question of murder, the defendant cannot object to a grant by the court of a manslaughter instruction.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.