Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 854 So. 2d 684 - Smith v. State

854 So. 2d 684 - Smith v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2003

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
March 2011
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 845 So. 2d 880 - Goad v. Florida Dept. of Corrections · 807 So. 2d 633 - Amendment to Fla. Rules of Cr. Proc. · Stewart v. State · Ortiz v. State · Reighn v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[a] defendant who enters a plea of guilty or nolo contendere may not seek postconviction DNA testing based on the language of the statute.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[a] person who has been tried and found guilty of committing a crime”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.