Keller v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
February 2005
most recently cited
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on McKane v. Durston · Drew v. State · McNew v. State · Phynes v. State · Olowosuko v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The requirements for obtaining a new trial upon newly discovered evidence are: 1. the newly discovered evidence was unknown to appellant at the time of his trial; 2. appellant’s failure to discover the evidence was not due to his want of diligence; 3. the materiality of the evidence is such as would probably bring about a different result in another trial; and 4. the evidence is admissible and not merely cumulative, corroborative, collateral or impeaching.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Waddy v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.