Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 854 SW2D 265 - Solomon v. State

Solomon v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
July 1997
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Reading Co. v. Schweitzer · Geesa v. State · Johnson v. Texas · Butler v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Bolstering” may perhaps be understood a little more precisely to be any evidence the sole pui-pose of which is to convince the factfinder that a particular witness or source of evidence is worthy of credit, without substantively contributing “to make the existence of [a] fact that is of consequence to the determination of the action more or less probable than it would be without the evidence.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.