Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 854 SW2D 304 - Nolte v. State

Nolte v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
February 2010
most recently cited

7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently February 2010

7 state decisions

50199320002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Montgomery v. State · Harris v. State · Kelly v. State · Studer v. State · Garcia v. Dial

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) the offenses are committed pursuant to the same transaction or pursuant to two or more transactions that are connected or constitute a common scheme or plan; or (2) the offenses are the repeated commission of the same or similar offenses.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Two or more offenses may be joined in a single indictment, information, or com plaint, with each offense stated in a separate count, if the offenses arise out of the same criminal episode, as defined in Chapter 3 of the Penal Code.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.