Shrader-Miller v. Miller’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
14
cited by 14 later decisions
2
states following
December 2014
most recently cited
1 district · 13 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Tuttle v. Raymond · Hanover Insurance Co v. Hayward · Haworth v. Feigon · Bonk v. McPherson · Landmark Realty v. Leasure
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Assuming that the statutory treble damages are a substitute for punitive damages for the intentional or knowing removal of agricultural products from the land of another, it follows that it is improper to award both treble damages and punitive damages against a defendant for the destruction of such products. It does not follow that punitive damages cannot be awarded for conduct that is separate and distinct from the conduct regulated by the statute. ... Because the treble damages were awarded for the [defendant’s] conduct in removing the bushes and the punitive damages were awarded for the [defendant's] other conduct, both awards can stand.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Fuschetti v. Murray
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.