United States v. Warner’s Empirical Analysis
855 F.2d 372 · 1988
Citation profile
17 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 26 U.S.C. § 6651
Relies on Cablevision Co. v. Motion Picture Ass'n of America, Inc. · Venturi v. California · Ruth v. United States · United States v. Watson · Sadowski v. Bombardier Ltd.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[c]ounsel has a duty to object, and even at the risk of incurring the displeasure of the trial court, to insist upon his objection.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“At the close of the evidence or at such earlier time during the trial as the court reasonably directs, any party may file written requests that the court instruct the jury on the law as set forth in the requests. The court shall inform counsel of its proposed action upon the requests prior to their arguments to the jury. The court, at its election, may instruct the jury before or after argument, or both. No party may assign as error the giving or the failure to give an instruction unless that party objects thereto before the jury retires to consider its verdict, stating distinctly the matter objected to and the grounds of the objection. Opportunity shall be given to make the objection out of the hearing of the jury.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Siddiqi v. Leak
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.