Mueller v. Regents of the University of Minnesota’s Empirical Analysis
855 F.2d 555 · 1988
Citation profile
5 federal appellate · 5 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently September 2024
5 federal appellate · 5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Wood v. Strickland · Pine River State Bank v. Mettille · Mandel v. United States · Decker-Ruhl Ford Sales, Inc. v. Ford Motor Credit Co. · Craft v. Wipf
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“contention that the notice letter must restate the details of the charges and identify his accuser”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.