United States v. Martinez’s Empirical Analysis
855 F.2d 621 · 1988
Citation profile
18 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1001 (Comprehensive Thrift and Bank Fraud Prosecution and Taxpayer Recovery Act of 1990) · 18 U.S.C. § 1623 · 28 U.S.C. § 1291
Relies on United States v. McConney · United States v. Prantil · United States v. Ponticelli · United States v. Berardi · United States v. Farnham
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“on checks that passed through All State Thrift's petty cash drawer. Her statements were material to tracing where this money went. Her statements had the natural tendency to influence the grand jury's investigation because they left unanswered the meaning of the”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[t]o sustain a perjury conviction under section 1623, the government must prove that the defendant made a 'false material declaration.' A false statement is not perjurious unless it is material.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“Since materiality is a legal question, the government need not prove it beyond a reasonable doubt”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.