Woosley Concorde Resources Inc v. P Woosley I’s Empirical Analysis
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 2 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently June 2025
4 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Torres v. Oakland Scavenger Co. · United States v. Pfizer Inc. · In re Sequoia Auto Brokers, Ltd. v. Idell · United States v. Chagra · Coffey v. Whirlpool Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the nature of a jurisdictional requirement: a litigant's failure to clear a jurisdictional hurdle can never be 'harmless' or waived by a court.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.