Brotherhood Railway Carmen, Division of Transportation Communications International Union v. CSX Transportation, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
855 F.2d 745 · 1988
Citation profile
9 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently June 2008
9 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1331 · 28 U.S.C. § 2321 · 45 U.S.C. § 152 (Railway Labor Act)
Relies on United Families of America v. Kendrick · Interstate Commerce Commission v. Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers · New York Dock Railway v. United States · Mary C. Northern v. Tennessee Department of Human Services · United Transportation Union v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“to bypass the appropriate procedures for review of the arbitration award ... rather than going through the normal channels of appeal to the ICC and then to the Court of Appeals.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.