Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,001’s Empirical Analysis
1979
Citation profile
7 district · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 35 later decisions — most recently September 2017 · most notably In Re Global Crossing, Ltd. Securities Litigation (2003), Arnold v. Society for Sayings Bancorp, Inc. (1996)
7 district · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on TSC Industries, Inc. v. Northway, Inc. · Affiliated Ute Citizens of Utah v. United States · Coates v. Securities & Exchange Commission · Securities & Exchange Commission v. Texas Gulf Sulphur Co. · Teague v. Regional Commissioner of Customs
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“); Gerstle v. Gamble-Skogmo, Inc., 478 F.2d 1281, 1298-1301 (2d Cir.1973) (noting that”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“(1) that the defendants acted fraudulently; (2) plaintiffs are entitled to the benefit of the bargain they would have obtained absent the fraud; (3) that any determination of damages must include a valuation of Chenango’s future earning power viewed prospectively from the date of the merger; (4) damages must be set at the amount of the defendants’ improperly obtained profit; (5) damages may include an award to the plaintiffs of the appreciation in value of securities acquired through the fraud; and (6) the better course is to give the defrauded plaintiffs the “benefit even of windfalls” than to allow the defendants to profit from the fraud.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority““No solicitation subject to this regulation [14A] shall be made by means of any ... communication, written or oral, containing any statement which, at the time and in the light of the circumstances under which it is made, is false or misleading with respect to any material fact, or which omits to state any material fact necessary in order to make the statements therein not false or misleading ...””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.