Ayala v. Sessions’s Empirical Analysis
855 F.3d 1012 · 2017
Citation profile
3 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1101 (§ 101 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1231 (§ 241 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (§ 242 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp. · Stone v. Immigration & Naturalization Service · Iturribarria v. Immigration & Naturalization Service · Cano-Merida v. Immigration & Naturalization Service · Henderson v. Shinseki
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a removal order is considered final only when 'all administrative proceedings have concluded,'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“apply[ ] rules in a manner that effects such a total deprivation of judicial review.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“in no way implicate[ ] the underlying ... removal order.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.