Margheim v. Buljko’s Empirical Analysis
855 F.3d 1077 · 2017
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Mitchell v. Forsyth · Pearson v. Callahan · Heck v. Humphrey · Singleton v. Wulff · Baker v. McCollan
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“As a federal court of limited jurisdiction, we have an independent obligation to confirm that our jurisdiction is proper.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Jimenez v. Sessions“to pursue the theory of liability he deems best.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.