Monk v. Shulkin’s Empirical Analysis
855 F.3d 1312 · 2017
Citation profile
4 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1651 · 38 U.S.C. § 7252 · 38 U.S.C. § 7261 · 38 U.S.C. § 7264 · 38 U.S.C. § 7266 · 38 U.S.C. § 7292 · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 717 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)
Relies on Gerstein v. Pugh · Aetna Life Ins Co of Hartford Conn v. Haworth · Powell v. McCormack · Sosna v. Iowa · Dunn v. Blumstein
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“can help the Veterans Court exercise [its] authority by promoting efficiency, consistency, and fairness, and improving access to legal and expert assistance by parties with limited resources”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Burris v. Wilkie“[t]o the extent [our] prior non-precedential rulings diverge from our holding today, any perceived conflict is superseded by today's precedential authority.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Martin v. O'Rourke“unlawfully withheld or unreasonably delayed,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Burris v. Wilkie
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.