Privitera v. Curran’s Empirical Analysis
855 F.3d 19 · 2017
Citation profile
9 federal appellate · 22 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 50 later decisions — most recently September 2024 · most notably United States v. Kilmartin (2019), Sindi v. El-Moslimany (2018)
9 federal appellate · 22 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 523 · 28 U.S.C. § 158
Relies on Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly · Ashcroft v. Iqbal · Grogan v. Garner · Field v. Mans · Teamsters Chauffeurs Warehousemen and Helpers Union Local No v. Superline Transportation Company Inc
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 50 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[C]ourts should not rush to decide unsettled issues when the exigencies of a particular case do not require such definitive measures.”
9 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[A] complaint need not set forth 'detailed factual allegations,' but it must 'contain sufficient factual matter . . . to state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face.'”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Dismissal is warranted when a complaint's factual averments are 'too meager, vague, or conclusory to remove the possibility of relief from the realm of mere conjecture.'”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.