United States v. Kimble’s Empirical Analysis
855 F.3d 604 · 2017
Citation profile
1 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1001 (Comprehensive Thrift and Bank Fraud Prosecution and Taxpayer Recovery Act of 1990) · 18 U.S.C. § 1028A · 18 U.S.C. § 1343 · 18 U.S.C. § 1546 · 18 U.S.C. § 2 · 26 U.S.C. § 7206 · 8 U.S.C. § 1325 (§ 275 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on United States v. Calandra · Arizona v. Evans · Maryland v. MacOn · United States v. Aramony · United States v. Dornhofer
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a search conducted pursuant to a warrant is limited in scope by the terms of the warrant's authorization.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“evidence obtained in violation of the Fourth Amendment cannot be used in a criminal proceeding against the victim of the illegal search and seizure.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.