Zarda v. Altitude Express’s Empirical Analysis
855 F.3d 76 · 2017
Citation profile
2 federal appellate ·
Appellate journey
reviewedthe decision below (from New York Eastern District Court)
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 701 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)
Relies on Price Waterhouse v. Hopkins · 133 S. Ct. 2517 - University of Tex. Southwestern Medical Center v. Nassar · Gordon v. New York City Board of Education · Pescatore v. Pan American World Airways, Inc. · Vega v. Hempstead Union Free School District
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Zarda's [federal] sex-discrimination claim [was] properly before [it] because [his state law claim was tried under] a higher standard of causation than required by Title VII.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“can only be overturned by the entire Court sitting in banc.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“decline[d] Zarda's invitation to revisit our precedent,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.