Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 855 FSUPP 402 - Spiegel v. Babbit

Spiegel v. Babbit’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
February 2016
most recently cited

2 district ·

Relationships

Relies on Conley v. Gibson · Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · Marymount Hospital, Inc. v. Shalala · United States v. Carter

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A permanent closure of a limited area within a park does not require the use of notice and comment procedures, unless it also has the effect of significantly altering or disrupting use by a substantial number of park visitors.... Public notice and comment is not intended to apply to measures taken to achieve routine resource management objectives, such as construction, facility maintenance or rehabilitation, and routine practices which are aimed at preserving the viability, integrity and natural character of the park ecosystem.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.