Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 855 NE2D 1014 - Johnson v. State

Johnson v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2006

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
January 2019
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Weaver v. State · Pickens v. State · Samaniego-Hernandez v. State · Haddock v. State · Wessling v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “When a defendant offers evidence of mitigators, the trial court has the discretion to determine whether the factors are mitigating, and it is not required to explain why it does not find the proffered factors to be mitigating.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.