Johnson v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently September 2024
4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Johnson v. Johnson · Burt v. Burt · Gardner v. Gardner · Haumont v. Haumont · Throckmorton v. Throckmorton
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[i]f ... future income ... is too speculative at the time of trial to anticipate the effect it will have on a receiving spouse's financial condition and needs, the court may, in its discretion, delay the determination of how the future income will affect the alimony award.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“appellate courts have consistently required that trial courts make adequate findings on all material issues of alimony to reveal the reasoning followed in making the award.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“if a trial court knows that a party will be receiving additional future income it should make findings as to whether such additional income will affect the alimony award.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.