Cannady v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
October 2017
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 440 So. 2d 297 - Groseclose v. State · 823 So. 2d 473 - Caston v. State · 478 So. 2d 266 - Keys v. State · 531 So. 2d 627 - Rowland v. State · Taylor v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“To consider on appeal an argument that evidence is insufficient to uphold [a] conviction, [this Court must] examine all of the evidence presented to the fact-finder, including reasonable inferences that arise from other evidence, in the light that is consistent with the verdict of guilt.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“we reverse only if rational and fair-minded jurors could not have found the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.