¶1AFFIRMED.1See Wright v. State, 857 So.2d 861, 2003 WL 21511313 (Fla. July 3, 2003) (“Habeas corpus should not be used as a vehicle for presenting issues which should have been raised at trial and on appeal or in postconviction proceedings”).
SHARP, W., THOMPSON and ORFINGER, JJ., concur.
¶2. We note that this court has precluded Davis from filing any additional pro se appeals, motions, or petitions pertaining to his convictions and sentences in case No. GO-7844, unless reviewed by an attorney licensed to practice in the State of Florida, see Davis v. State, 852 So.2d 963 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003); however, Davis filed this appeal prior to issuance of that mandate.
