Womack v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
November 2012
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 632 So. 2d 1372 - Hopkins v. State · Mathis v. State · In Interest of Rlr
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“there is not reversible error because . . . appellant's general objection to the child hearsay statements failed to preserve this issue for appellate review.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Elwell v. State“that appellant's general objection, recognized by the trial court as a continuing objection, preserved the issue for appeal.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Elwell v. State“that the trial court did not make specific findings of fact on the record as required by section 90.803(23)(c)”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Elwell v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.