855 So. 2d 169 - Horowitz v. Laske’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 10 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 374 So. 2d 490 - Houdaille Industries, Inc. v. Edwards · Wendt v. Horowitz · 571 So. 2d 422 - Goldschmidt v. Holman · 512 So. 2d 192 - Angel, Cohen & Rogovin v. Oberon Inv., NV · 537 So. 2d 561 - ARKY, FREED v. Bowmar Instrument Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“forces counsel to recognize the elements of their cause of action and determine whether they have or can develop the facts necessary to support it.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“shall contain . . . (2) a short and plain statement of the ultimate facts showing that the pleader is entitled to relief.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“At the outset of a suit, litigants must state their pleadings with sufficient particularity for a defense to be prepared.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.