State v. Howard’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
May 2017
most recently cited
9 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 338 So. 2d 584 - State v. Crosby · Cryts v. French · 433 So. 2d 104 - State v. Square · 709 So. 2d 672 - State v. Johnson · State v. Hogan
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Every person shall be secure in his person, property, communications, houses, papers, and effects against unreasonable searches, seizures, or invasions of privacy. No warrant shall issue without probable cause supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, the persons or things to be seized, and the lawful purpose or reason for the search. Any person adversely affected by a search or seizure conducted in violation of this Section shall have standing to raise its illegality in the appropriate court.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Stephens
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.