Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 855 SW2D 66 - Lookingbill v. State

Lookingbill v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
November 2007
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Mendenhall · Wainwright v. Witt · California v. Hodari D. · MacArthur Co. v. Johns-Manville Corp. · Kashif v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In ruling upon the admissibility of evidence, the judge shall not discuss or comment upon the weight of the same or its bearing in the case, but shall simply decide whether or not it is admissible; nor shall he, at the verdict, make any remark calculated to convey to the jury of his opinion of the case.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.