Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 855 SW2D 729 - Lindley v. State

Lindley v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
August 2017
most recently cited

7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently August 2017

7 state decisions

40199320002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Pinkerton v. United States · Grady v. Corbin · United States v. Bayer · United States v. Felix · Lindley v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Double Jeopardy Clause does not bar successive prosecutions for a substantive offense and for conspiracy to commit that offense, even where the State proves the same conduct in both prosecutions, and even where the previously prosecuted conduct constitutes an overt act in the conspiracy prosecution.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.