Nellson v. Bayly’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Richmond Newspapers, Inc. v. Virginia · Press-Enterprise Company v. Superior Court of California Riverside County · Globe Newspaper Company v. Superior Court for County of Norfolk · Press-Enterprise Company v. Superior Court of California for County of Riverside · United States v. Edwards
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“to justify closure of a protected judicial proceeding, the trial court must find that closure serves a compelling interest; that in the absence of closure there is a ‘substantial probability’ that this compelling interest would be harmed; and that there are no alternatives that would adequately protect that compelling interest.”) 16 .See Globe Newspapers Co. v. Superior Court, 457 U.S. 596 , 609 n. 25, 102 S.Ct. 2613 , 73 L.Ed.2d 248 (1982) ("[Rjepresenta-tives of the ... general public must be given an opportunity to be heard on the question of their exclusion.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.