Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 856 F.2d 1165 - Thomas v. Bennett

Thomas v. Bennett’s Empirical Analysis

856 F.2d 1165 · 1988

Citation profile

40
cited by 40 later decisions
February 2019
most recently cited

12 federal appellate · 7 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 40 later decisions — most recently February 2019 · most notably United States v. Hanover Insurance (1996), Missouri Coalition for the Environment v. Corps of Engineers of the United States Army (1989)

12 federal appellate · 7 district ·

2601988199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 20 U.S.C. § 1082 · 26 U.S.C. § 6402 · 28 U.S.C. § 2415 (Indian Claims Limitation Act of 1982) · 31 U.S.C. § 3720A

Relies on Roe v. Wade · Powell v. McCormack · Globe Newspaper Company v. Superior Court for County of Norfolk · Chase Securities Corp. v. Donaldson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 40 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““[t]he limitation set forth in section 2415(a) does not terminate all of the government’s rights on a contract claim after six years, but merely eliminates one potential remedy — the filing of a lawsuit seeking money damages. There are numerous avenues by which the underlying obligation embodied in the contract may be enforced after the six year period____ The statute of limitation can be differentiated from events which would extinguish the underlying obligation, such as discharge in bankruptcy, statutory discharge by reason of death or disability, or the successful assertion of defenses such as fraud in the inducement or failure of consideration.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “(b) Past-due legally enforceable debt eligible for refund offset. For purposes of this section, a past-due legally enforceable debt which may be referred by a Federal agency to the Service for offset is a debt— (2) Which, except in the case of a judgment debt, has been delinquent for at least three months but has not been delinquent for more than ten years at the time the offset is made; (emphasis in original).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “fits well within the classic exception to the mootness doctrine for disputes which are 'capable of repetition, yet evading review.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.