856 F.2d 1433
Docket No. 87-3967.
Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1988-09-14
3 counsel of record
Relies on 660 F. Supp. 1164 - Clark v. United States
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1988-09-14
Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently September 2017
8 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1William G. Cole, U.S. Dept, of Justice, Washington, D.C., for defendant/appellant.
¶2David R. Lord, Ferguson & Burdell, Seattle, Wash., for Ed Nojd et al.
¶3G. Lee Raaen and Ann Cross Eschen-bach, Seattle, Wash., for Mary Clark et al.
¶4*1434Before ALARCON and BEEZER, Circuit Judges, and NIELSEN,* District Judge.
¶6ORDER
¶7We affirm the decision of the district court for the reasons stated in the district court’s opinion, which is reported in Clark v. U.S., 660 F.Supp. 1164 (W.D.Wash.1987).