Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 856 F.2d 1434 - Boniface v. Carlson

Boniface v. Carlson’s Empirical Analysis

856 F.2d 1434 · 1988

Citation profile

26
cited by 26 later decisions
May 2015
most recently cited

15 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently May 2015 · most notably Tucker v. Carlson (1991), Munguia v. U.S. Parole Commission (1989)

15 federal appellate ·

1601988199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2253 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on United States v. Dovalina · Vanes v. United States Parole Commission · New England Reinsurance Corp. v. National Union Fire Insurance · United States v. Blankenship

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A prisoner in state custody who cannot secure his release on bail because of a federal detainer is entitled to credit against his federal sentence for the time he would otherwise be out free on bail.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[b]eing deprived of this right is all the prejudice necessary to support [a petitioner's] claim of lack of due process.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[i]t would appear that forfeiture is not automatic or certain but is discretionary with the Commission,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.