Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 856 F.2d 1471 - United States v. Marr

United States v. Marr’s Empirical Analysis

856 F.2d 1471 · 1988

Citation profile

52
cited by 52 later decisions
November 2015
most recently cited

20 federal appellate · 11 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 52 later decisions — most recently November 2015 · most notably United States v. Grossich (1995), United States v. Brian David Roth (1995)

20 federal appellate · 11 district ·

2601988199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 21 U.S.C. § 846 (§ 406 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on MacHibroda v. United States · Scharffe v. Perkins · Newfield v. United States · Hedman v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 52 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “enumerate the issues raised by the prisoner, and explain the reasons for that action. Such a disposition provides a basis for appellate review of the dismissal of the motion that, standing alone, might arguably have some merit.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[u]nless the motion and the files and records of the case conclusively show that the prisoner is entitled to no relief.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Where a record is available which would support or contradict a defendant's factual challenge to his conviction, the district court judge cannot rely solely on his own recollection of events to rule on the merits.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.