Garrow v. Gramm’s Empirical Analysis
856 F.2d 203 · 1988
Citation profile
5 federal appellate · 5 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently May 2024
5 federal appellate · 5 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 294 · 5 U.S.C. § 2101A · 5 U.S.C. § 2102 · 5 U.S.C. § 2103 · 5 U.S.C. § 2108 · 5 U.S.C. § 2301 (Notification and Federal Employee Antidiscrimination and Retaliation Act of 2002) · 5 U.S.C. § 2302 · 5 U.S.C. § 3132
Relies on Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth · Cleveland Board of Education v. Loudermill · United States v. Fausto · Doe v. United States Department of Justice · Griffith v. Federal Labor Relations Authority
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“by existing rules or understandings that stem from an independent source such as state law--rules or understandings that secure certain benefits and that support claims of entitlement to those benefits.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Hall v. Ford
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.