Rudolph v. Parke’s Empirical Analysis
856 F.2d 738 · 1988
Citation profile
17 federal appellate · 4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently October 2002 · most notably Dunn v. Simmons (1989), Carpenter v. Mohr (1998)
17 federal appellate · 4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2313
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Boykin v. Alabama · Rose v. Lundy · Lord Electric Co. v. United States · Bradley v. J. F. Batte & Sons of Richmond, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“It is settled law in this circuit that a constitutional claim which is presented to the state courts, regardless of whether they address and dispose of it, will satisfy the exhaustion requirement.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“We cannot presume a waiver of these important federal rights from a silent record.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Brymer v. Dutton
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.