Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 856 F.2d 764 - Roland v. Johnson

Roland v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis

856 F.2d 764 · 1988

Citation profile

56
cited by 56 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
August 2017
most recently cited

36 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 56 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently August 2017 · most notably Farmer v. Brennan (1994), United States v. Lara (1990)

36 federal appellate ·

4401988199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 636 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Estelle v. Gamble · Thomas v. Arn · Whitley v. Albers · United States v. Raddatz · Patterson v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 56 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “a judge of the court shall make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which objection is made.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[T]he legal standard applicable to determining whether a violation of the Eighth Amendment occurred in the context of an assault upon an inmate is whether the defendant['s] conduct amounted to a 'deliberate indifference' to a risk of injury to [the] plaintiff.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “because of investigative reports linking them to an ongoing homosexual pressure gang ... and because of hearsay evidence that [they] were pressing other inmates in the block for sex.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.