Russell v. Bowen’s Empirical Analysis
856 F.2d 81 · 1988
Citation profile
19 federal appellate · 5 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 60 later decisions — most recently April 2016 · most notably Magallanes v. Bowen (1989), Fair v. Bowen (1989)
19 federal appellate · 5 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 401 (§ 201 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 405 (§ 205 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on Sample v. Schweiker · Vincent v. Heckler · Miller v. Heckler · Waters v. Gardner
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 60 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“It is not necessary to agree with everything an expert witness says in order to hold that his testimony contains 'substantial evidence.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Magallanes v. Bowen“more than a few days short of the cut-off date.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“adds nothing of substance to the record.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.